COVID-19 Alert: Filing Bankruptcy While Isolating or in Quarantine

Failure to Mark Tradeline “Disputed” is a Violation of the FCRA

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Hrebal v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Case No. 17-cv-1815; D. Minn., June 14, 2019

The U.S. District Court granted summary judgment for the Plaintiff on a motion for reconsideration on the ground that the mortgage company negligently violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act when it repeatedly failed to report the consumer’s account as “disputed” in responses to the at-issue ACDV’s.

The Court determined that there are no material factual disputes for a jury to resolve with respect to liability: the FCRA imposes liability on “furnishers” of consumer credit information, like Mr. Cooper, who fails to report that loan delinquency is “disputed.” A “reasonable investigation” could have uncovered that a borrower’s dispute with that delinquency was “bona fide” or ‘potentially meritorious.” This is so because reporting that a delinquency is, in fact, disputed may be necessary to prevent the dissemination of “materially misleading” consumer credit information.

In this case, it was undisputed that Mr. Cooper received at least three official dispute notifications, that Mr. Cooper never reviewed his pre-2014 servicing notes and gleaned that the Plaintiff’s dispute stemmed from a legitimate and longstanding “proof of claim” error, that Mr. Cooper confirmed the Plaintiff’s delinquency three times in a confusing and inconsistent manner, and that this reporting gave the impression that the Plaintiff had fallen behind on his mortgage immediately after his bankruptcy when, in fact, he had not missed a payment in over five years.

The Court cited four recent case decisions that also granted summary judgment for the Plaintiff on the under the “failure to report a debt as disputed” theory. Those Courts found that a “reasonable investigation” would have uncovered that the consumer’s dispute was, at the least, “bona fide” and that the furnisher needed to mark the debt as “disputed.” The Court cited Saunders v. BB&T (4th Circuit), which found that “a disputed debt differs materially from an undisputed debt even if the consumer would not succeed at a trial of the dispute.”

Did you find any inaccuracies in your credit report? Many people have gone through this, and oftentimes, they have a hard time effectively resolving these cases alone. That’s why for a more efficient resolution and more insight into your rights, you can enlist the help of a credit report attorney in Annapolis MD.

Let’s talk about your situation today and start taking control of your finances.

Sign up for our Newsletter

I utilize simple technology to allow us to meet and share documents remotely. You will get the same service as if you came into my physical office and you will be able to get the protections afforded through bankruptcy while in your own home.


Call or Request a Consult below to find out how. All calls are forwarded to my personal cell phone; if I am unable to answer, please leave a message and I will return your call as soon as I am able to.