Duty to Investigate Dispute Remains Whether or Not Consumer Responds to Request for Information

Sponer v. Wells Fargo, et al.

3:17-cv-02035-HZ

D. Ore – Portland

Consumer/Plaintiff was a victim of identity fraud – his ID was used to purchase a vehicle when he was out of the country.  Police arrested the man who used the Plaintiff’s identity, confiscated the stolen vehicle, and obtained a confession from the thief. 

Wells Fargo was notified of this through a letter from the Plaintiff.  Wells Fargo contacted the police on multiple occasions they have heard of the incident. The police then confirmed the underlying facts and returned the vehicle to Wells Fargo.

Despite this, Wells Fargo refused to remove the loan off of the Plaintiff’s credit report claiming that it’s their obligation to conduct a reasonable investigation when the Plaintiff failed to provide the specific documents requested. The Court didn’t buy this reasoning and noted that Wells Fargo had access to all, or nearly all, of the information it was requesting. The Court also noted that Wells Fargo cited no authority supporting this position.

The Court ruled that a jury could find that this investigation was not reasonable and allowed the count to move forward.

Are you a victim of identity theft? Know your rights in cases of identity theft when you contact an experienced identity theft attorney in Annapolis MD today. Baneylaw, P.C., Bankruptcy and Consumer Law has helped many clients resolve financial identity theft cases throughout the years.

Let’s discuss your situation today!